![]() ![]() May be next time someone creates an article which is enough referenced for your strict eyes. ✉ 16:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply I see, references were missing.MovieFex ( talk) 16:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply I think that there is an expectation that an editor will not create unreferenced stubs with unproven notability on English Wikipedia, regardless of the fact the same topic may have equally unreferenced articles on other languages of Wikipedia. So I thought a hint to wikidata would be helpful enough and in interest of enwiki to get an item for it's own. Beg me pardon that I hadn't the right words to explain all reasons for a seperate article. frwiki/ruwiki/ptwiki) and enough for a stub. So I checked the article here and saw, there is enough potential to develop (how was shown in other wikis e.g. Sergecross73 msg me 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply PresN: I was aware of the article because of wikidata, there at a maintenance page. Consider myself a fourth (of probably endless) people who oppose this as well. Pres N 16:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply Regardless, its not a valid reason for making decisions on en-wiki. One is an acceptable thing to debate, right or wrong, the other is absolutely unsupported and raises alarming red flags about future trends. MovieFex ( talk) 16:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply MovieFex: ignoring that your example of a developed article is a 4-paragraph plot summary + trivia section, the discussion is not whether or not the film article should be merged to the video game series/franchise article because of the merits of the articles in question, but your opposition based on the effect it would have at wikidata. And with merging you lost information, too. In every other wiki this article is for it's own and had a chance to develop see e.g. Pres N 14:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply It's a pitty. Wikidata's internal item structure has no bearing on en.wiki's article structure. ferret ( talk) 14:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply Thirded, absolutely not. Even if Enwiki has one article for both topics, Wikidata can still have two separate entities. ✉ 14:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply To add to Salv's comments, nothing requires that Wikidata match Enwiki.As pro-Wikidata and metadata as I am, even I know Wikidata cannot dictate enwiki content policy. Is that really a valid reason for unmerging something? - Mika1h ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply Of course not. This article was unmerged from Siren (video game series) article because it "caused a constraint violation in Wikidata" (see talk page). 97 Can an admin please block the following IP address: User talk:124.140.68.89?.91 Infobox video game and video game series.89 Can you delete the redirect of WP:SONIC WP:WikiProject Sonic?.88 Yooka-Laylee/Jontron controversial comments.86 Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2017.83 Untold History of Japanese Game Dev v.81 Disruptive edits on Naruto-related pages.80 About Koei, Koei Tecmo and the revolving pages.74 Removing (s) from the infobox video game.73 One more review needed at Resident Evil 5 FAC.71 Kill Screen and its possible closure.68 The Times Search Mode has now got a revamp!.59 Multiplayer, single-player infobox order.57 New reference source for arcade games.56 ToonTown Online and Independent vs.55 Quick set of eyes on Star Wars: Masters of Teräs Käsi.51 New page Rifleman (arcade game) (1967 electro-mechanical shooter).49 Updated Find video game sources search template.47 List of video game companies inclusion criteria. ![]() 42 Quick opinion needed for Accolade tables.38 Adding OpenCritic as a review aggregator.35 Backlog at GA nominations for Video Games.34 Sources sought for The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker.33 Help with Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire reception. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |